Answer engine optimization
Answer-first pages for buyer questions
- Retrieve
A per-section checklist of answer-first passages on one page, with the exact passage quoted rather than a score, to show what a system could lift.
Free to use. No login, nothing stored.
Method question for this stage: Can a passage be lifted as a clear answer?
No check run yet
One checklist per H2 or H3 section, then page-level rows
Answer-first opening sentence (quoted), definition when the heading is a question, numbers with a nearby source link; then dates, author and FAQ text for the page. Counts only, no score.
These are heuristics about retrievability, not predictions of citation. They are stage 4 of the method; what we measure in practice is in the Lab.
How we check
A result is a check against a published rule, not a prediction. Every row shows its working.
Links go to the operator's or standards body's own documentation. We do not link to third-party summaries.
Next step
This check belongs to the Retrieve stage of the Crawl-to-Citation Method. The service below covers the fix; the Diagnostic ranks it against everything else.
Answer-first pages for buyer questions
It covers all six method stages, so what this tool finds is ranked against everything else before you commit to any work.
Book the diagnosticWhat the checklist tests, and what it does not claim.
Still have questions? Book a callA score would imply we can predict whether a passage gets quoted, and nobody outside the engines can. What we can do is test the passage against the Retrieve-stage checklist we use in client work: does the section open with the answer, does a question heading get a definition, do numbers carry a source, is the page dated and signed. Each row quotes the passage so you can disagree with the heuristic.
The first sentence under a heading repeats the heading's key terms and stays short, 40 words or fewer here. A retriever that splits the page into passages then has a self-contained chunk that matches the question. The threshold is ours, chosen so that a two-line answer passes and a paragraph of preamble does not; the quoted sentence lets you judge borderline cases.
Google's helpful-content guidance asks whether a page shows who wrote it and when, and its AI features documentation says content needs to be in the HTML to be used. An FAQ whose answers exist only in JSON-LD or arrive by JavaScript is not visible text. These rows report what is in the server HTML; they do not judge the quality of the author or the date.
Last reviewed