Core Web Vitals
Core Web Vitals are three user-experience metrics Google reports for real page loads: Largest Contentful Paint (loading), Interaction to Next Paint (responsiveness) and Cumulative Layout Shift (visual stability).
Published
Core Web Vitals are three user-experience metrics Google reports for real page loads: Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) for loading, Interaction to Next Paint (INP) for responsiveness, and Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) for visual stability. Google’s thresholds, measured at the 75th percentile of page loads, are LCP 2.5 s or less, INP 200 ms or less and CLS 0.1 or less for “good”.
Field versus lab
The numbers that matter are field data: what real users experienced, collected through the Chrome User Experience Report and shown in Search Console and PageSpeed Insights. Lab tools such as Lighthouse simulate a load and are useful for diagnosis, but they cannot measure INP and their scores are not what Google uses.
Effect on search
Google documents Core Web Vitals as part of its page experience signals. They are not a ranking shortcut: good vitals do not lift a weak page, and poor vitals rarely sink a strong one. They matter most where two pages are otherwise similar, and they matter to users regardless.
Where to look
Search Console’s Core Web Vitals report groups URLs by status; PageSpeed Insights shows field and lab data for one URL. Our Core Web Vitals tool queries PageSpeed Insights for a URL and labels each field metric by Google’s category.
Sources
Check it on your site
Technical SEO Consulting
Crawling, rendering, indexation, architecture, migrations and Core Web Vitals — diagnosed in order and fixed with your developers.
Learn more about Technical SEO ConsultingRead: Which AI crawlers should you allow? A practical robots.txt policy